![]() Those looking to improve upon the traditional 3-2-1 strategy are turning to a more robust 4-3-2-1 backup plan- which includes storing data in the cloud and creating an immutable copy of your data. Recovery after data loss can be a massive process spanning days and tanking operational productivity. Organizations need other backup options that enable them to recover quickly and comprehensively against ransomware and other modern-day threats. They generate huge amounts of data every day. Today’s organizations are larger than ever. Low bandwidth at remote sites can also make data recovery painfully slow. This leads to more significant data gaps at recovery- which could span hours or even days. As such, recovery could take longer, and fewer restore points are likely to be available. The organization would only have access to the next available data-backup copy, which is held remotely. If, for example, the ransomware deleted or encrypted local backups and snapshots, recovery times could be drastically lengthened. If a user on a system inadvertently lets malware in, however, the entire network could be compromised-meaning that near-instant recovery might not be possible. Traditional backup methods based on the 3-2-1 rule take periodic snapshots of data to fall back on. Unfortunately, this legacy approach to data protection simply isn’t robust enough to appropriately address modern-day cyberattacks. Keeping multiple copies of data in separate locations makes organizations more resilient to cyberattacks because if one copy is impacted, there are others safely available in another location or storage medium.Īlthough IT environments have changed significantly since the 3-2-1 rule was first introduced, today's organizations still use the strategy to tackle data loss. Since its introduction, the 3-2-1 rule has become the industry standard for simple and effective data protection and disaster recovery. The 3-2-1 rule of data backup was designed to help ensure that people and organizations could successfully recover data following an event such as data corruption, accidental data deletion, physical-device failure/loss, or physical damage (such as from a fire or flood). The data-security landscape has changed immensely since the 3-2-1 backup rule was introduced in the mid-aughts as the field has advanced, old approaches to security are no longer the most effective to mitigate data loss. Modern data landscapes call for modern solutions to most effectively get companies back up and running following an attack. But organizations using this approach might find that their recovery isn't as fast as expected- or even guaranteed. This strategy requires having three copies of your data, on two different forms of media, with one offsite copy. The traditional wisdom behind business continuity and disaster recovery (BC/DR) can exacerbate the problem when an attack first happens and data is lost. Many companies still rely on the old 3-2-1 backup approach. When a ransomware attack causes data loss, it can halt an organization's ability to properly function for long stretches of time. Data is a critical resource to today's digitally enabled companies- and it’s absolutely central to keeping business operations running.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |